Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jule Niemeier vs Emily Appleton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niemeier vs Appleton analysis and find out who is favored!
Jule Niemeier vs Emily Appleton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Niemeier 1 - 0 Appleton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niemeier has won 43.65% of points on their second serve, while Appleton has won 47.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niemeier, in recent form, has won 58.82% of their opponent's second serve points, while Appleton has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.35% and 35.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niemeier has saved 54.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Appleton has saved 52.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niemeier has won 57.35% of matches played (W/L 39/ 29), with Appleton winning 53.97% (W/L 34/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 126/ 65), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 32/ 37). Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11), where as Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niemeier winning 1 times and Appleton being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Niemeier winning 2 and Appleton winning 0. The last match between Niemeier and Appleton was at the W25+H Leipzig, 15-08-2019, Second, Clay with Jule Niemeier getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niemeier and Appleton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Niemeier winning 0 times and Appleton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niemeier winning 0, and Appleton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niemeier has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.19 while Appleton has played against players with an average rank of 280.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niemeier has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Appleton has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niemeier has converted 49.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Appleton has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
97
Rank
61
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
399
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (202-134)
Career Total W/L
50% (181-179)
64% (28-16)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$1,090,343
Career Prize Money
$2,804
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jule Niemeier | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (29/55) | 58% (43/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 32% (10/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (38/74) | 38% (21/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jule Niemeier
Player
Emily Appleton
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jule Niemeier | Emily Appleton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (28/16) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (63/39) | 53% (37/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (510/430) | 50% (325/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 57% (12/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.63 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 198 |
| DFs per game | 0.6 | 0.61 |
| DFs Total | 273 | 192 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:56 | 1:27:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 196.98 | 275.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1775/3184) | 57% (1174/2046) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1138/1775) | 70% (824/1174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (615/1409) | 47% (406/872) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (212/429) | 39% (93/241) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1537/3145) | 41% (907/2187) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (14/7) | 56% (18/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (28/44) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (30/27) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (30/3) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 18% (17/3) |
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jule Niemeier
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
0-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Dalma Galfi
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Lauren Davis
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura-Ioana Paar
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
19 of
29)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Jule Niemeier
63%
(
81 of
129)
1st Serve %
50%
(
70 of
140)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
12
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
64 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
74 of
140)
139
Total Points Won
130
|
6-4 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Ankita Raina
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
49%
(
56 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Jule Niemeier
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Niemeier Vs Appleton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
